Skip To Main Content

Logo Image

Rokeach M 1973 The Nature Of Human Values Pdf


If you need a specific chapter summary, table of terminal/instrumental value rankings by demographic group, or comparison with Schwartz’s model, let me know and I can provide that in detail.

In his 1973 book, The Nature of Human Values , social psychologist Milton Rokeach

defined a value as an "enduring belief" that a specific mode of conduct or state of existence is personally or socially preferable to its opposite . His work introduced the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS)

, a widely used tool that helps individuals and researchers understand human motivation by ranking 36 core values. ResearchGate Core Framework: Terminal vs. Instrumental Values

Rokeach divided the human value system into two interconnected categories: Wiley Online Library rokeach m 1973 the nature of human values pdf

In his seminal 1973 work, The Nature of Human Values , social psychologist Milton Rokeach

redefined how we understand the "enduring beliefs" that guide our lives

. He proposed that human values are limited in number and organized into a hierarchical system, serving as the foundational reference points for all our attitudes and behaviors. Google Books The Core Framework: Terminal vs. Instrumental Values

Rokeach’s most significant contribution was the classification of values into two distinct but interconnected categories: International Journal of Organizational Leadership Terminal Values (The "What") If you need a specific chapter summary ,

: These refer to desirable end-states of existence—the ultimate goals a person hopes to achieve during their lifetime.

Happiness, freedom, equality, family security, a world at peace. Instrumental Values (The "How")

: These refer to preferable modes of behavior or means of achieving terminal values. Honesty, ambition, logic, courage, helpfulness. The Rokeach Value Survey (RVS) To measure these concepts, Rokeach developed the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS)

, a psychometric tool still widely used in psychology, marketing, and sociology. No theory is perfect

Milton Rokeach's 1973 work, The Nature of Human Values , remains a foundational text in social psychology, shifting the field's focus from fleeting attitudes to deeply ingrained value systems. He defines a value as an enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end-state of existence is personally or socially preferable to its opposite. Core Concepts: Terminal vs. Instrumental Values

Rokeach identified 36 values divided into two distinct categories that form the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS):


No theory is perfect. Scholars have noted that:


Rokeach collected data across large American samples (late 1960s–early 1970s). Major findings:

  • Stability over time – 7–18 month test-retest correlations ranged from .60 to .80 for most values (moderate to high stability).
  • Logo Title


    If you need a specific chapter summary, table of terminal/instrumental value rankings by demographic group, or comparison with Schwartz’s model, let me know and I can provide that in detail.

    In his 1973 book, The Nature of Human Values , social psychologist Milton Rokeach

    defined a value as an "enduring belief" that a specific mode of conduct or state of existence is personally or socially preferable to its opposite . His work introduced the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS)

    , a widely used tool that helps individuals and researchers understand human motivation by ranking 36 core values. ResearchGate Core Framework: Terminal vs. Instrumental Values

    Rokeach divided the human value system into two interconnected categories: Wiley Online Library

    In his seminal 1973 work, The Nature of Human Values , social psychologist Milton Rokeach

    redefined how we understand the "enduring beliefs" that guide our lives

    . He proposed that human values are limited in number and organized into a hierarchical system, serving as the foundational reference points for all our attitudes and behaviors. Google Books The Core Framework: Terminal vs. Instrumental Values

    Rokeach’s most significant contribution was the classification of values into two distinct but interconnected categories: International Journal of Organizational Leadership Terminal Values (The "What")

    : These refer to desirable end-states of existence—the ultimate goals a person hopes to achieve during their lifetime.

    Happiness, freedom, equality, family security, a world at peace. Instrumental Values (The "How")

    : These refer to preferable modes of behavior or means of achieving terminal values. Honesty, ambition, logic, courage, helpfulness. The Rokeach Value Survey (RVS) To measure these concepts, Rokeach developed the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS)

    , a psychometric tool still widely used in psychology, marketing, and sociology.

    Milton Rokeach's 1973 work, The Nature of Human Values , remains a foundational text in social psychology, shifting the field's focus from fleeting attitudes to deeply ingrained value systems. He defines a value as an enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end-state of existence is personally or socially preferable to its opposite. Core Concepts: Terminal vs. Instrumental Values

    Rokeach identified 36 values divided into two distinct categories that form the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS):


    No theory is perfect. Scholars have noted that:


    Rokeach collected data across large American samples (late 1960s–early 1970s). Major findings:

  • Stability over time – 7–18 month test-retest correlations ranged from .60 to .80 for most values (moderate to high stability).