Why not just use CoolTerm or Putty?
| Feature | SSCOM v5.13.1 | PuTTY | CoolTerm | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Multi-String Sending | Yes (8 hotkeys) | No | Limited (via macros) | | Hex Display | Excellent (Side-by-side) | Poor | Average | | YMODEM Support | Yes | No | No | | Filesize | <1 MB | 5 MB | 15 MB | | English Version | Perfect | Native | Native |
Verdict: For embedded engineers who need to send repetitive commands (e.g., polling a sensor), SSCOM is dramatically faster than PuTTY. sscom v5131 english version download best
Once you have SSCOM v5.13.1 English running, try these capabilities that other terminals lack:
If you want the original source (though in Chinese), use amobbs.com. Why not just use CoolTerm or Putty
Note: SSCOM is developed by a Chinese software author. "Official" global distribution channels are limited.
Searching for "sscom v5131 english version download best" on Google or Baidu leads to a minefield of fake sites. Here are the most common traps: Once you have SSCOM v5
Go to the GitHub mirror. Click on sscom5.13.1_english.exe. Download it to a folder like C:\Tools\SSCOM.
After downloading the English version: